Banks Push on CLARITY Act as Mid-May Markup Looms

What To Know About This Week’s CLARITY Act Push—And Why Mid-May Is Now Key

The Senate seems close to a key decision regarding the CLARITY Act, which has been delayed for months. This week will likely reveal whether the bill will pass or if further negotiations will be needed, potentially pushing a final decision to mid-May.

Banks Pressure Banking Committee Members

According to a report from Eleanor Terrett at Crypto In America on Monday, the Senate Banking Committee needs to officially schedule a review of the CLARITY Act by Friday if they want to vote on it the week of April 27th. However, meeting this deadline could be difficult.

Because traditional banks are pushing to have a say in how stablecoins earn returns, and Senator Thom Tillis wants to discuss their concerns, the planned review of the legislation might be delayed until the Senate returns from its break in early May.

Terrett reported earlier that Senator Tillis’s office has been the target of pressure from banking groups, such as the North Carolina Bankers Association.

Several groups are dissatisfied with the limitations on stablecoin yields in the latest draft of the bill. They are urging banking industry members to reach out to Senator Tillis’s office and voice their objections.

It seems Senator Tillis isn’t alone in this effort. Industry groups are also contacting other members of the Banking Committee, in addition to Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks, who are currently leading the discussions.

Negotiations recently led to a tentative agreement late last month, which the cryptocurrency industry appears to generally accept – or at least isn’t publicly fighting. However, the full text of the CLARITY Act hasn’t been made available yet.

What’s Still Unsettled In The CLARITY Act  

After initial silence following recent meetings, discussions about potential changes have grown louder, especially after the White House released a report on the interest earned from stablecoins.

According to someone with knowledge of the situation, the current issue is partially caused by how trade associations operate. This person explained that smaller banks nationwide suffer when Washington-based groups prioritize achieving ideal results instead of accepting compromises that would at least prevent customers from withdrawing their deposits.

Despite growing pressure, Senator Tillis expressed some optimism about getting a schedule in place for considering the CLARITY Act. He acknowledged there are still a few details to work out through further negotiation, but believes a markup session could happen in the next few weeks. However, the issue of stablecoin yields isn’t the only remaining point of discussion.

In addition to disagreements about potential profits, the CLARITY Act is still grappling with ethical concerns and how it applies to decentralized finance (DeFi). These issues need to be resolved before lawmakers can vote on the bill.


Read More

2026-04-21 13:57