Key Farces Unveiled
- ZachXBT, the modern-day Nosdrove, accuses Hayes of turning followers into exit liquidity for NEAR, HYPE, ZEC, and WLD.
- Hayes, the crypto Raskolnikov, claims innocence: “I merely report, you merely weep.”
- “AI jitters”-a macro thesis so grand, it makes Dead Souls look like a grocery list.
- HYPE still shines in Hayes’s eyes, like a mirage in a Gogolian steppe-sold, but not forgotten.
Arthur Hayes, the BitMEX bard and Maelstrom’s maestro, has emerged from the shadows to swat away accusations that he used his audience as a financial stepping stone. In a theatrical interview with Cointelegraph’s Giovanni Pigni, Hayes addressed on-chain sleuth ZachXBT’s claims with the flair of a man who’s read too much Gogol and traded too much crypto.
The Accusation: A ZachXBT Tragedy
The drama began when ZachXBT, the crypto Inspector Hlesstal, pointed a bony finger at Hayes’s trading timeline. After Hayes unwound positions in NEAR, HYPE, ZEC, and WLD faster than a Gogol character changes identities, the investigator asked on X how much “exit liquidity was created from your followers,” listing the tokens like a litany of sins. The sequence, as predictable as a Gogol plot twist, drew scrutiny because each sale followed bullish public commentary that had lured retail investors like moths to a flame.
How much exit liquidity was created from your followers over the past couple days?
First NEAR HYPE ZEC Now WLD
– ZachXBT (@zachxbt) June 6, 2026
Hayes Responds: A Defense Fit for a Bureaucrat
Hayes, with the confidence of a man who’s survived both crypto winters and Gogol’s absurdity, was direct in his defense. “I’m not a money manager, I’m a narrator,” he proclaimed, drawing a line between reporting his trades and advising others. “I never claimed to be a financial advisor-I’m more of a financial fabulist.” He challenged ZachXBT to find a single post where he told followers to buy or sell, adding, “I tell people what I’m doing. If they follow, that’s their tragic flaw.”
On why he posts his trades publicly, Hayes was blunt: “I’m in the attention business. My goal is to create a thesis so grand, it makes ‘The Nose’ look like a footnote.”
The Real Reason: “AI Jitters” or Gogol’s Madness?
Hayes framed the sales as a macro thesis shift, not a change in sentiment. He developed what he calls “AI jitters,” a condition so profound it makes Gogol’s characters seem stable. “The liquidity that should have driven crypto was absorbed by the AI trade,” he explained, tracing it to first principles: $1.5 trillion in AI-related debt issued between 2022 and 2026, with 75 to 80% concentrated from 2025 onward. “All the dollars went to finance AI, and none to Bitcoin. That’s why we suffered from October 2025 to the present.”
Three specific risks drove his decision to exit, each more Gogol-esque than the last. First, energy prices: the US-Iran conflict, a modern-day bureaucratic nightmare, restricts Strait of Hormuz flows, pushing oil and gas prices higher. Second, US politics: Trump, the ultimate Gogol character, may turn against AI companies to win votes, tapping into fears of job displacement. “If I created the AI tech bros, I can destroy them,” Hayes quipped. Third, a supply wall: SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI listing at trillion-dollar valuations, creating an absorption problem as lockups expire. “SpaceX is a low float, high FDV shitcoin,” he summarized.
Zcash: A Trust Violation, Not a Thesis Call
Hayes separated ZEC from the macro-driven sales, calling it a trust violation rather than a thesis call. After the Orchard Pool bug was discovered and patched, he said he could not hold the position without formal verification that no unauthorized minting occurred. “I cannot hold that in good conscience if there’s no formal verification,” he said, sounding like a Gogol character grappling with existential dread. “We have to be perfect. I’m not going to hold the amount of money we were holding in Zcash if my belief of perfection has been violated.”
Still a Believer in Hyperliquid: A Gogolian Mirage
Despite selling HYPE, Hayes was emphatic that his exit was about timing, not the project. “HYPE is one of the best products ever made in crypto, like a mirage in a Gogolian steppe,” he said. “It has great product-market fit and actually makes money-a rarity in this absurd world.” On valuation, he noted Maelstrom entered around 9x earnings, with current multiples near 20x. “Compared to Coinbase at 60x, Robinhood at 45x, and CME at 25x, HYPE is undervalued,” he concluded. The sale, he maintained, was a liquidity-timing call, not a change in conviction.
The Post-AI-Bubble Case for Bitcoin: A Gogolian Apocalypse
Looking past the immediate caution, Hayes sketched two paths if the AI bubble bursts: emergency money printing that benefits Bitcoin, or a financial crisis triggered by over-leveraged AI companies. Either way, he expects Bitcoin to outperform AI stocks once the dust settles. “People will be done with AI. They’ll want something else. And buffered by more printed money, Bitcoin is going to outperform,” he said, sounding like a prophet in a Gogol novel.
His framework for choosing altcoins is narrow: clear revenue-generating mechanisms, actual paying clients, and profit flowing back to token holders. “If you accomplish all that, you’ll be like Hyperliquid-a rare gem in a sea of absurdity.”
The Unresolved Question: A Gogolian Paradox
The exchange leaves a genuine tension unresolved. Hayes’s macro reasoning is internally consistent, but the timing of his sales-four publicly endorsed positions fully exited within two weeks-invites scrutiny. His defense, that he reports rather than advises, is accurate but does not address the asymmetry between his reach on the way up and his speed on the way out. Readers are left to ponder: a coherent macro case for de-risking, or a timing pattern that invites exactly the question ZachXBT raised?
Read More
- Gold Rate Forecast
- Silver Rate Forecast
- USD THB PREDICTION
- USD PKR PREDICTION
- Brent Oil Forecast
- USD CNY PREDICTION
- USD PHP PREDICTION
- EUR HKD PREDICTION
- USD KRW PREDICTION
- USD RUB PREDICTION
2026-06-14 12:15