Bitcoin Drop Explained: ETFs, Not Crypto Panic, Says Procap

by

Bitcoin’s sharp stumble on February 5, 2026, was, by most reckonings, a kettle of ETFs and TradFi deleveraging rather than a crypto eclipse, according to Jeff Park, Procap’s chief investment officer, who guards his charts as closely as his jokes.

Bitcoin’s Feb. 5 Drop Was an ETF Jape, Not a Crypto Calamity, Says Jeff Park

Park, wagging his finger on X, explained that the data now suggests the dip rode shotgun with one of the most volatile days in global capital markets, while BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) strutted into record trading volume-north of $10 billion, more than twice its previous high-paired with the liveliest options activity since the ETF’s debut.

According to Park, the options flow wore a notably sombre hat, leaning toward puts rather than calls, a sign of hedged rather than rhapsodic speculation. And IBIT’s price action did not wander far from software stocks and other risk assets, lending weight to the notion that Bitcoin was being swept up in a broader risk unwind rather than suffering a crypto-specific hiccup.

Park pointed to data from Goldman Sachs’ prime brokerage desk showing Feb. 4 ranked among the nastiest daily performances on record for multi‑strategy hedge funds, a 3.5 z‑score of a day. “It was catastrophic,” Park wrote, noting that such episodes tend to prompt risk managers to call for rapid, indiscriminate de‑grossing across portfolios, which probably seeped into Feb. 5 trading as well.

Despite Bitcoin dropping more than 13% that day, Park stresses that ETF flows refused to follow the old script. Instead of heavy redemptions, IBIT recorded roughly 6 million new shares created, translating to more than $230 million in added assets under management (AUM), while the broader spot ETF complex saw inflows exceeding $300 million.

Park says this counterintuitive outcome suggests the selling pressure came largely from hedged, market-neutral strategies rather than outright exits. “The sell-off did not end in outflows of bitcoin assets,” he writes, concluding that activity was dominated by dealers and market makers operating within the “paper money complex.”

A key driver, Park argued, was the forced unwinding of the CME bitcoin basis trade. He highlighted that near-dated CME basis spreads jumped from roughly 3.3% on Feb. 5 to about 9% on Feb. 6, one of the largest single-day moves since spot ETFs launched, consistent with large funds being directed to reduce leverage.

Park also cited structured products and options dynamics as accelerants. As downside barriers were breached, dealers hedging knock‑in risk were forced to sell underlying exposure into weakness, amplifying downside momentum as implied volatility briefly approached extreme levels.

By Feb. 6, Bitcoin rebounded more than 10%, a move Park linked to the re-expansion of CME open interest as market-neutral strategies re-entered positions. He concluded that the episode points to Bitcoin’s growing integration into TradFi markets, writing that “the catalyst came from non-crypto TradFi derisking,” not a fundamental breakdown within the crypto sector itself.

FAQ ❓

  • What caused Bitcoin’s Feb. 5 sell-off?
    Park believes it stemmed from TradFi deleveraging and ETF-related hedging, not crypto-native selling.
  • Did investors exit Bitcoin ETFs on Feb. 5?
    No, Park reported net creations across spot Bitcoin ETFs despite the price drop.
  • Why did options activity matter?
    Put-heavy positioning and short-gamma dynamics forced dealers to sell into weakness.
  • What explains Bitcoin’s rebound on Feb. 6?
    Park pointed to the return of CME basis trades and market-neutral positioning after leverage was reduced.

Read More

2026-02-08 10:58