Indonesia has blocked access to Polymarket, a popular platform where users predict future events using cryptocurrency. This action highlights a growing debate about how these kinds of prediction markets should be regulated – specifically, when they cross the line into being considered illegal betting, and which authorities should make that determination.
As a researcher, I’ve put together a guide explaining how prediction markets function. I explore why these markets are sometimes considered gambling by regulators, specifically focusing on the relevant agencies and laws in Indonesia. I also detail important considerations for both people using these markets and those building them. Finally, I compare prediction markets to more familiar platforms like sportsbooks and derivatives trading to highlight where the distinctions – and overlaps – lie.
Quick Answer
Indonesia has blocked Polymarket because it views prediction markets where people bet real money as a form of online gambling, unless they have a specific license. Regulators see these platforms as betting services, not just places to share information, because users put money on the line for uncertain events. Typically, Indonesia enforces these rules by having internet service providers block access to these platforms, citing laws against gambling and unlicensed content.
- Prediction contracts look like wagers to many regulators, even if framed as “markets.”
- In Indonesia, multiple agencies and rules intersect: gambling prohibitions, content controls, and commodity/crypto oversight.
- Other countries have applied derivatives or gambling laws to similar platforms; the U.S. CFTC’s 2022 action led Polymarket to geoblock U.S. users.
- Users face access, custody, and legal risks when a platform is blocked; avoiding circumvention is prudent.
What is Polymarket, and how do crypto prediction markets actually work?
Polymarket is an online platform where you can trade based on how likely you think future events are. Users buy and sell shares that earn money if a specific outcome happens – for example, a share predicting ‘yes’ on an event will pay out $1 if the event actually occurs, and $0 if it doesn’t. The price of these shares generally reflects what people believe the chances of that outcome are. Polymarket uses blockchain technology (originally on Polygon) and stablecoins like USDC to handle transactions.
Smart contracts and liquidity pools handle pricing and automatically complete trades. Markets define how outcomes will be determined and rely on a resolver or oracle to verify them. Once an event finishes, the smart contract automatically pays out winners, similar to how binary options or event futures work, but presented as a user-friendly marketplace.
Although some people believe these platforms harness the power of the crowd to make better predictions, regulators are concerned with what’s actually happening: users are putting money on the line with uncertain results, hoping to profit. This activity could be considered gambling or fall under financial regulations, depending on where it takes place.
Why would Indonesian regulators see Polymarket as gambling?
Indonesia has strong rules against online gambling and any online content that isn’t properly licensed. Specifically, websites that let people bet real money on things happening in the future – like the outcome of political elections or entertainment events – are likely considered gambling under the usual definition. This is especially true when the payouts aren’t based on actual business risks, but simply on whether or not an event happens.
Officials are concerned about the potential negative impacts of online betting, including addiction, underage gambling, fraud, and unregulated offshore sites. Even though a decentralized app (dApp) might not be controlled by a single entity, Indonesia’s government can still require internet service providers to block access to websites and apps involved in illegal activities.
Be careful when trying to bypass government restrictions (like using a VPN). It could be against the law where you are, and it might put you at risk of scams, fake websites, or identity theft. If a service is blocked, your safety and following the law should come first.
Even if a platform is meant for finding information, it could be considered a gambling site if people risk money on uncertain results, especially if the platform doesn’t have the proper license to operate as a gambling site in Indonesia.
Which Indonesian laws and agencies decide what’s allowed online?
Multiple Indonesian laws and regulations potentially apply to prediction markets, and they often intersect with each other.
- Kominfo (Ministry of Communication and Informatics) can direct ISPs to restrict access to online content considered illegal, including unlicensed gambling. Its content-moderation powers are broad and frequently used in anti-gambling campaigns. See Kominfo’s site for policy context: kominfo.go.id.
- Gambling prohibitions under criminal law apply to online and offline betting. Real-money prediction markets on non-financial events can be captured by these provisions.
- Bappebti (Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency) supervises commodity futures and recognizes certain crypto assets as commodities for trading on licensed platforms. See agency info: bappebti.go.id.
- Bank Indonesia bars the use of crypto as legal tender and polices payment systems. Stablecoin-based wagering could raise payment-system and AML concerns.
- OJK (Financial Services Authority) oversees financial institutions and consumer protection; overlaps may occur when services resemble investment products.
As a crypto investor, I’ve noticed regulators can move *really* quickly to block things, often faster than they can actually create clear rules or licensing processes. So, even if a crypto project *could* technically be classified as a regulated financial product, launching it without getting the proper local approvals – or if it involves things like prediction markets that aren’t considered traditional finance – could still get you in trouble as if you were running an illegal gambling operation or an unlicensed business.
A good first step for anyone creating or using these products is to figure out if it could be considered “betting” according to Indonesian law, and if a relevant license is available. If both of those things are uncertain, the chance of the product being blocked increases.
Prediction markets vs sportsbooks vs derivatives—what’s the real difference?
Event markets resemble both betting and financial trading, but regulators focus on key distinctions, as shown in the table below. Because real-world platforms often blend characteristics of these categories, deciding where they fit can be difficult.
Here’s a breakdown of how prediction markets, sportsbooks, and derivatives exchanges differ:
Prediction Markets deal with any event where the outcome can be verified, like elections or achievements in the crypto world. Payouts are straightforward – you either win a set amount or you don’t, or you receive a payout proportional to the outcome. They’re mainly used to gather information and allow people to speculate on future events. Regulations vary, and they may be treated as gambling or derivatives, often with little oversight, especially if operating outside of established regulatory frameworks.
Sportsbooks/Gambling focus on sports, casino games, and sometimes political events (where legal). Winnings are determined by odds set by the house or an exchange. The primary goal is entertainment and wagering. They are heavily regulated, requiring strict adherence to ‘Know Your Customer’ (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) rules, as well as consumer protection measures.
Derivatives Exchanges trade based on the price of financial or commodity indices. Payouts are calculated using ‘mark-to-market’ principles, margin requirements, and settlement against a reference price. These exchanges are used for hedging risks and speculation. They face strict regulations concerning capital requirements, reporting, and market conduct.
In the United States, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has generally considered event contracts to be similar to swaps or options. In 2022, the CFTC penalized Polymarket, a platform offering these contracts, and required it to stop serving U.S. customers. Polymarket now blocks users located in the U.S. More information about the CFTC is available at cftc.gov.
In Indonesia, activities resembling gambling, even if not directly involving money, are generally prohibited. Similarly, offering financial services related to derivatives without a license is also illegal. Authorities can block access to any such unauthorized activities.
How are other countries drawing the line right now?
There is no global consensus. A few broad patterns are visible:
In the U.S., laws governing financial derivatives frequently apply to prediction contracts. While some platforms have found ways to legally offer predictions on limited topics like economic data, markets focused on political outcomes are highly contentious and subject to legal battles and government reviews. For example, PredictIt, a prediction market linked to academics, saw its legal protections reduced, and Kalshi, another platform, faced opposition when it tried to offer contracts based on political events – highlighting the ongoing debate about what’s legally permissible.
In the UK, the Gambling Commission considers competitions where people bet with real money as gambling, unless they’re covered by financial regulations. Rules for betting on politics are stricter than those for sports, and there’s a strong emphasis on protecting customers.
The European Union’s MiCA regulations cover the creation and operation of crypto-assets, but they don’t directly regulate gambling. Betting on events with cash prizes usually falls under each country’s own gambling laws, not MiCA.
Regulations for online betting across Asia and the Pacific are diverse. Some countries focus on banning gambling and limiting financial transactions related to it, while others are testing controlled environments for certain types of betting. However, most consistently restrict betting on events offered by unlicensed, overseas companies directly to individual customers.
What risks do users face when a platform is blocked?
Restrictions imposed by regulations can instantly change how risky your investments are. Even if you could access a platform before, you might suddenly find you can’t sell your investments, get your money out quickly, or be sure you’re using the real website. If many users are blocked at once, it can also make it harder to buy or sell at a good price.
- Access disruption: DNS/IP blocks can cut off the front end even if contracts persist on-chain. Alternative UIs may be unsafe.
- Custody uncertainty: If funds are in a custodial wallet or a contract you access through a single UI, you may be stuck until a compliant withdrawal path appears.
- Legal exposure: Attempting to bypass blocks could breach local law and your platform’s terms.
- Scams and lookalikes: Blocks can spawn phishing “mirrors” that steal keys or stablecoins.
To stay compliant, don’t try to bypass platform rules, keep an eye on official announcements, and use approved methods for withdrawing funds when possible. If you’re operating in a country with strict regulations, it’s also wise to limit your activity before important regulatory dates.
If you build a forecasting dApp, how can you avoid the ‘gambling’ tag?
As an analyst, I’ve found there’s no simple way to *guarantee* a product avoids gambling or financial regulation. However, the choices we make in design and how we govern the product significantly impact its risk profile. If it starts to look and feel like traditional betting, it’s much more likely to be categorized as gambling. Similarly, if it functions like a regulated financial derivative, we can expect increased licensing and compliance requirements. It really comes down to how the product is structured and operates.
- Define your perimeter: Limit markets to areas with plausible regulatory treatment (e.g., economic indicators) and avoid political or entertainment bets in strict jurisdictions.
- Localization controls: Implement geofencing, IP screening, and jurisdiction-specific market availability. Honor blocks and takedowns promptly.
- Identity and controls: Apply risk-based KYC/AML and age gating where legal access is permitted. Provide stake limits and cooling-off features.
- Disclosures and governance: Publish clear rules, resolvers, dispute processes, and fee schedules. Audit contracts and list security contacts.
- Licensing strategy: Evaluate whether a gambling, derivatives, or information-services license is needed in target markets, and engage regulators early.
Many teams experiment with prediction methods that don’t involve real money, like using points or internal forecasting software. They might also create research markets where participants don’t win cash prizes. While these systems could be questioned if points can be exchanged or turned into money, they generally aren’t considered gambling under the law.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming decentralization cures legal risk: Even if contracts are on-chain, front ends and operators can be targeted; users can still face local penalties.
- Ignoring payment rails: Using stablecoins or local gateways may trigger payment-system and AML obligations beyond “just a dApp.”
- Listing everything, everywhere: Offering political or entertainment markets to the general public invites gambling classification and swift blocks.
- Skipping user protection: Lack of KYC, age checks, stake limits, and clear disclosures increases regulatory and reputational risk.
- Encouraging block circumvention: Advising users to bypass restrictions can compound legal exposure for everyone involved.
For ongoing coverage of regulation and market structure in crypto and DeFi, visit Crypto Daily.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a prediction market always considered gambling in Indonesia?
From my research, it seems that while there isn’t always a specific law against it, betting real money on things that aren’t financial – like the outcome of a game or event – is generally considered gambling. And if someone is offering these bets without the proper license and protections for customers, it’s likely their service will be blocked. It’s a pretty standard outcome when operating without authorization.
Could a prediction market be regulated as a derivative instead of gambling?
It’s possible these agreements could be considered derivatives if they involve financial values, but that would then require them to comply with strict commodity or securities regulations – a difficult standard for platforms serving individual customers.
Does Polymarket have any regulatory history outside Indonesia?
In 2022, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) reached a settlement with the company running Polymarket, which offered prediction markets to users in the U.S. After this, Polymarket blocked access for U.S. users. Regulators often point to this case when considering other similar platforms.
Are on-chain positions safe if the website is blocked?
Smart contracts might still have funds available, but it can be tricky to access them securely without the official platform tools. Using fake websites or unapproved applications could put your funds at risk. It’s best to wait for official instructions from the platform and avoid any unofficial copies or mirrors.
Do play-money or points-based forecasting sites avoid gambling rules?
While these systems lessen risk, they don’t eliminate it entirely. If points can be exchanged for money or used to win prizes, existing gambling or consumer protection laws might still be relevant. Whether those laws apply depends on how the system is designed and how local regulations define things like ‘value’ and ‘prizes’.
What compliance features matter most to regulators?
To ensure fairness and safety, platforms need clear rules about who can participate, including age verification and identity checks when necessary. They should also set limits on wagers, have clear guidelines for settling outcomes, offer a way to resolve disagreements, and quickly address problematic content. Often, official licenses or approvals are crucial for operating legally.
Is this financial or legal advice?
Prediction markets can be unpredictable and involve legal challenges. Before you participate in or create one, it’s important to get legal advice specific to your location and carefully consider potential risks for consumers and how regulators might view it.
Read More
- Gold Rate Forecast
- ZEC PREDICTION. ZEC cryptocurrency
- BTC PREDICTION. BTC cryptocurrency
- WLD PREDICTION. WLD cryptocurrency
- Brent Oil Forecast
- USD CNY PREDICTION
- NEAR PREDICTION. NEAR cryptocurrency
- EUR CNY PREDICTION
- USD RUB PREDICTION
- USD JPY PREDICTION
2026-05-26 20:21