Hyperliquid’s $780M Buyback: A Tale of Triumph and Token Tears 😂💸

by

The Great Divide: Where Fortune Favors the Bold

Why Did Hyperliquid Soar While Others Sank Like Stones? 🌊⚰️

Ah, the irony of it all! Hyperliquid, with its $780M buyback, laughed all the way to the bank, pocketing a 65% gain. Why? Because it’s not just a DEX-it’s a revenue-generating machine with a token that actually does something. Meanwhile, the likes of Jupiter, Bonk, and LayerZero lost $98M, proving that throwing money at a problem doesn’t make it go away. 🤑💨

Who Wore the Dunce Cap in the Buyback Circus? 🎪🤡

Bonk, the clown prince of crypto, led the losers’ parade with a -57% nosedive, despite burning $26.65M. Close behind were Ether.fi (-31.4%), LayerZero (-31.5%), Kaito (-28%), and Jupiter (-27.5%). Truly, a spectacle of financial folly! 🤹♂️💔

Seven projects gambled $1.1B on buybacks. Only Hyperliquid walked away with a profit. The lesson? Buybacks don’t create value-they just expose what’s already there. Or, as the old saying goes, “You can’t polish a turd.” 💩✨

Hyperliquid: The Sole Survivor in a Sea of Red 🌊🔴

According to Tokenomist, Hyperliquid stands tall on the buyback leaderboard. Behold, the evidence of its glory:

The perpetuals DEX spent $780M to buy back 34.41M HYPE tokens. Today, they’re worth $1.28B, netting a cool $508.55M profit-a 65.16% margin. Meanwhile, the others? Let’s just say they’re drowning in their own tears. 🌊😭

Bonk lost 57% despite its $26.65M gamble. LayerZero dropped 31.5% after burning $100M. Ether.fi fell 31.4% with $7.73M spent. And Jupiter? Down 27.5% after $62.12M in buybacks. The combined losses? A whopping $98M across six projects that spent $321M. Ouch. 😖💸

Why Hyperliquid Didn’t Just Win-It Dominated 🏆💪

Hyperliquid isn’t just a pretty face; it’s a revenue-generating beast. Perpetual futures trading? Check. HYPE tokens for fee discounts and perks? Double check. The buyback didn’t create demand-it supercharged what was already there. 🚀💰

HYPE trades at $38.43, down 4.33% today but still flexing after climbing from $35 in late October. The accumulation/distribution indicator? Screaming “buy, buy, buy!” despite the rollercoaster ride. 🎢📈

The $780M buyback created a supply shock on a young token with limited circulation. And let’s not forget-Hyperliquid timed its purchases during its growth phase, not after the party was over. Timing, folks. It’s everything. ⏳✨

Why the Others Crashed and Burned 🔥💥

Bonk? No revenue model, no utility, just a buyback trying to fake demand. The market saw right through it. Trading at $0.00001166, down 56% from October highs. Oof. The accumulation indicators? A mass exodus of -30.47 trillion tokens. Yikes. 🚪💨

Jupiter, Solana’s DEX darling, spent $62M but couldn’t overcome its weak token utility. LayerZero burned $100M but offered nothing beyond speculation. The pattern’s clear: buybacks are no substitute for fundamentals. Markets don’t do band-aids. 🩹❌

So, there you have it-a tale of triumph and token tears. Hyperliquid laughed its way to the top, while the rest learned the hard way: you can’t buy success. Unless, of course, you’re Hyperliquid. 😎🚀

Read More

2025-11-04 21:27