Is Polygon’s Staking Scheme Doomed? Experts Say It’s a Custodial Crisis!

by

It appears that a considerable portion, indeed over a third, of staked POL resides in the hands of various exchanges. Experts, with their ever-astute observations, opine that no mere protocol upgrade can remedy the burgeoning custodial staking dilemma that plagues the Polygon network.

A rather alarming structural issue is afoot within the esteemed Polygon network.

The ever-watchful market observer, Mr. Just Hopmans, has recently sounded the alarm via the social media platform X, drawing attention to the disconcerting concentration of staked POL among our beloved centralized exchanges.

As Mr. Hopmans so eloquently points out, a staggering third of all staked POL finds its residence with Upbit, Coinbase, and Binance-indeed, a veritable trifecta of custodial power. Upbit possesses approximately 400 million POL, Coinbase around 340 million, and Binance a respectable 255 million. Most users, in their convenient application-driven lives, merely tap “stake” without a second thought.

Alas, they do not deign to select a validator, ponder over commission rates, or even question the fate of their rewards.

Over a third of all staked POL resides with exchanges. Upbit (400M), Coinbase (340M), Binance (255M).

Most simply tap “stake” in an app. They neither choose a validator nor compare commissions. The exchanges, in their infinite wisdom, dictate all.

Why this conundrum proves difficult to resolve…

– Just Hopmans (@HopmansJust)

How Exchange Staking Distorts POL Validator Power

The crux of the matter, dear reader, lies in the matter of control. Exchanges gallantly run their own validators whilst collecting staking rewards on behalf of their unsuspecting customers. Mr. Hopmans has highlighted a particularly striking case indeed.

Consider Upbit, which self-stakes the modest sum of 1 POL yet miraculously earns 1,975,024 POL in its last reward payout-valued at a rather impressive $193,000. One cannot help but marvel at such an extraordinary return, crafted almost entirely from the tokens of its customers.

PIP-85, a recent proposal from the Polygon protocol, aims its sights directly upon this imbalance. Under the new regulations, Upbit’s validator income would plummet by 86%, descending from a lofty 1,975,024 POL to a meager 283,298 POL per cycle. The Polygon team merits commendation for such an endeavor; however, Mr. Hopmans argues that the deeper issues remain unaddressed.

Exchanges continue to hoard customer POL within wallets firmly under their control. The staker pool obligingly sends rewards to these wallets, yet nothing within the blockchain compels exchanges to return those rewards to their rightful owners. It is in this chasm between what the protocol pays and what users ultimately receive that the true problem resides.

Read also:

A Polygon Proposal Could Redistribute Millions in Crypto Rewards

Why Protocol Fixes Only Go So Far Against Custodial Staking

Fear not, for Polygon does possess certain tools at its disposal.

Mr. Hopmans has outlined several prudent options the team might consider. Establishing a yield gap between custodial and non-custodial staking could effectively persuade power users to make their great exodus. Promoting liquid staking tokens, like stPOL or MaticX, might divert reward flows back through the noble protocol.

Moreover, the publication of validator commission rates could potentially expose exchanges that charge users naught while reaping the bountiful harvest.

A minimum self-stake ratio presents another avenue worth exploring. Mandating that validators underpin substantial delegations with actual capital significantly raises the stakes of the current arrangement. Indeed, Upbit’s self-staking of a single POL against a delegation of 400 million renders this imbalance painfully evident. Yet, Mr. Hopmans wisely notes that none of these mechanisms wholly eradicate the problem.

Upbit self-stakes 1 POL on 400 million in delegation. Earned 1,975,024 POL last payout. A staggering $193,000. All from just 1 POL.

Under PIP-85, their validator income drops 86% – from 1,975,024 to 283,298 POL. A commendable effort by the Polygon team.

Yet they still hold their customers’ staked POL in…

– Just Hopmans (@HopmansJust)

The protocol merely inspects addresses; it cannot discern whether an address belongs to a well-heeled exchange or a humble private Ledger wallet owner. Any rule predicated on identity would shatter the very notion of decentralization, while any cap on commissions would unjustly penalize the diligent validators rendering honest services. To banish exchanges in totality is simply a task beyond the reach of current on-chain capabilities.

POL Tokenomics Face a Challenge Bigger Than Any Fee Formula

Mr. Hopmans has labeled custodial staking as the most pressing structural challenge confronting POL tokenomics today, eclipsing any ongoing debates regarding fee formulas circulating through the hallowed halls of the Polygon community.

The candid conclusion drawn from his analysis is unmistakably clear. Polygon may diminish this dilemma, yet it cannot resolve it solely through code.

No smart contract exists that compels a user to migrate their POL away from the warm embrace of an exchange.

Education and an enhanced user experience could prove advantageous. Presenting users with a transparent comparison-such as a paltry 2% on an exchange versus a generous 5.8% through non-custodial staking-might gradually alter behaviors. However, one must acknowledge that behavioral shifts occur at a glacial pace, and exchanges wield significant structural advantages.

Mr. Hopmans has tagged Polygon co-founder Mr. Sandeep Nailwal and several accounts within the Polygon ecosystem in his post, directly inquiring how the team intends to respond to this predicament.

The query currently reverberating throughout the Polygon community is a simple one: Will those who stake through exchanges ever receive their fair share of rewards? At present, there exists no guarantee that they shall.

Read More

2026-03-29 09:16