Polymarket’s Shocking Double-Counting Scandal! 🚨💰

by

Somewhere in the tangled jungle of blockchain data, a rather embarrassing “data bug” has been nibbling away at the truth like a mischievous gremlin with a calculator. According to a sharp-eyed researcher at Paradigm, the reported trading activity on Polymarket might be as inflated as a pufferfish at a tea party. 🐡☕

“Turns out,” said Storm, the researcher (who probably has a last name like Thunderbolt or Whirlwind), “almost every major dashboard has been counting Polymarket volume twice-like a waiter who charges you for two meals when you only ate one.”

Storm explained, with the patience of someone explaining why cake is delicious to a very slow child, that Polymarket’s onchain data is “redundant”-a fancy word for “doing the same thing twice and confusing everyone.”

“Polymarket’s onchain data is quite complex,” Storm sighed, “which is another way of saying ‘a complete nightmare.’ This has led to everyone adopting accounting methods as flawed as a chocolate teapot.”

Here’s the juicy bit: when trades happen on Polymarket, the system burps out multiple “OrderFilled” events-one for makers (who sit around waiting) and one for takers (who pounce like hungry wolves). These events describe the same trade from different angles, like two people arguing over whether a tomato is a fruit or a vegetable. But dashboards, being tragically literal, counted them twice. 🍅🤦‍♂️

Polymarket, the golden child of crypto lately, might now be caught with its hand in the cookie jar. Its sparkling success? Possibly as real as a unicorn’s dental records. 🦄📊

Polymarket’s Blockchain Data: A Riddle Wrapped in a Mystery Inside an Enigma 🧩

The researcher went on, waving their hands like a magician revealing a trick, that this bug “inflates volume metrics like a balloon at a clown convention.”

“Polymarket’s data has been notoriously confusing,” Storm admitted, “like trying to untangle headphones after they’ve been in your pocket for five minutes. You need more than a block explorer-you need a wizard.”

The complexity comes from trades that can be simple swaps or “splits” and “merges,” which sound like a bad haircut but are actually ways to exchange cash for opposing positions. The smart contracts emit redundant events (because why not?), and blockchain explorers don’t bother explaining, leaving analysts scratching their heads like confused pigeons. 🕊️🤔

CryptoMoon asked Polymarket for comment, but all they heard was the sound of crickets and a distant scream. 🦗😱

Polymarket: Worth $9 Billion (Or Maybe Half That?) 💸🤷‍♂️

The Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) recently valued Polymarket at a whopping $9 billion-citing $25 billion in trading volume, which might now be as reliable as a chocolate fireguard.

Back in September, whispers said Polymarket was prepping for a US launch at $10 billion. By October, Bloomberg claimed it was eyeing $12-$15 billion. Meanwhile, Dune Analytics proudly announced a record $3.7 billion in November volume-except, oops, it might actually be half that if Paradigm’s right. Whoopsie-daisy! 🙃

“DefiLlama, Allium, Blockworks, and many Dune dashboards were double-counting,” Storm revealed, sounding like a detective exposing a grand conspiracy. “It’s like everyone’s been using the same broken abacus.”

Prediction markets are growing faster than a beanstalk in fairy-tale fertilizer, but as Storm wisely concluded, “The industry needs consistent reporting standards-preferably ones that don’t involve counting things twice like a toddler with jellybeans.” 🎯

Read More

2025-12-09 07:27