Aave’s newest drama is hotter than your last breakup: the ACI and Aave Labs are fighting over who gets the $50M.
A simple twist of chain lightning hit Aave’s governance when the Aave Chan Initiative and Aave Labs released their very own opponent‑style reports on funding, revenue, and accountability. Both parties show off their shiny spreadsheets just in time for a community vote on a $50 million lottery ticket for a brand‑new operating model.
Rival Reports Set Out Competing Funding Narratives
The heart of the noise is the “Aave Will Win” blueprint, offering Aave Labs up to $42.5 million in stablecoins plus 75,000 AAVE tokens. In return, it promises to funnel every single second of revenue from Aave-branded products straight into the DAO treasury-the boy, the myth, the soggy good bet.
Tomorrow’s Snapshot for the $51M “Aave Will Win” ask is dropping like a hot potato. Check out our audit of Aave Labs’ performance and their ~$86M patience‑till‑now funding before plugging into your brain. It’s not just some cute Twitter thread; this is the crossroads of the community.
– Aave-Chan Initiative {ACI} (@AaveChan)
Marc Zeller, the man who coined “ACI” (I couldn’t spell it otherwise), decided to do some retroactive detective work on Aave Labs’ funding track record. He applied a return‑on‑investment lens to past DAO grants and demanded clarity: how do we know if a grant actually made a thing happen?
Zeller went on to say that future DAO grants should be judged by measurable revenue impact and crystal‑clear disclosure-because what’s worse than vague promises? He even suggested separating funding, revenue alignment, and V4 ratification within governance votes, obviously because the world is still too simple to handle everything in one go.
Aave Labs Details Historical Contributions
In response, Aave Labs launched its own glossy report, celebrating its saga since 2017. They celebrated milestones like V1, V2, V3, flash loans, the Safety Module, and Efficiency Mode. “These features,” they claim, “are the golden grocery list that generates revenue and keeps users humming.”
They also pointed out that screenshots of governance proposals and forum posts just don’t capture the nitty‑gritty of tech and security work-maintaining infrastructure for millions of users needs a full‑time army of overqualified zillions of people.
Related Reading: AAVE at Major Support After 86% Crash – 10x Setup Forming?
Governance Vote Raises Broader Accountability Questions
The funding proposal isn’t just about money; it’s also a vote to ratify Aave V4 as the long‑term tech foundation. The plan even includes a brand‑new foundation to steward Aave under a DAO‑funded umbrella.
Some community members rightly gagged at the size of the package, especially the 75,000 AAVE tokens-those bad boys hold voting power and can shift the balance in ways that would make a politician blush. The debate loops into questions about revenue definitions and governance holdings, with critics from Feb. 13 demanding clearer disclosure, and BGD Labs announcing its exit on April 1.
Token holders will soon decide the fate of Aave after reviewing both hand‑crafted reports. The outcome could rewrite the script of governance, funding, and revenue allocation in the coming months.
Read More
- BTC PREDICTION. BTC cryptocurrency
- USD MYR PREDICTION
- Gold Rate Forecast
- USD JPY PREDICTION
- USD VES PREDICTION
- Silver Rate Forecast
- EUR USD PREDICTION
- Nubank’s Bank Hunt: Drama, Debt & a Dash of Deception! 🎩💸
- Bitcoin Crumbles: $125K Dream Dies in Gulag of Broken Hopes 😵💫📉
- 🤑 Schwab’s $12 Trillion Crypto Splash: Will Exchanges Drown in Discounts? 🌊
2026-02-25 22:47