A Most Curious Affair: The Great Crypto Licensing Race in Vietnam

by

Key Highlights

  • The Vietnamese government has launched a landmark pilot program to license domestic cryptocurrency exchanges.
  • Applicants face a staggering minimum capital requirement of 10 trillion VND (~$380 million), ensuring only the most liquid and institutionalized firms participate.
  • New Ministry of Finance drafts propose a full ban on citizens trading on overseas platforms like Binance and OKX.

Five of Vietnam’s largest corporations, with all the zeal of young ladies at a quadrille, are vying to secure the nation’s inaugural cryptocurrency exchange licenses. This grand endeavor, as ambitious as a baron’s attempt to host a ball in London, seeks to redirect a staggering $200 billion in annual transactions from the wilds of international platforms into the tender embrace of state supervision. One might imagine the Ministry of Finance sipping tea with a satisfied air, as they prepare to cast a veil over overseas trading-a move as calculated as it is theatrical.

A $200B Market, Now in Polite Company

In the realm of cryptocurrency adoption, Vietnam ranks a sprightly fourth globally, according to the 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index. For years, this activity flitted about like a mischievous squirrel in a garden, neither explicitly forbidden nor formally invited. Holding digital assets was permitted, yet cryptocurrencies were barred as a means of payment under a 2017 State Bank directive, a contradiction as charming as a gentleman who claims to adore solitude but frequents every salon in town.

All this changed on January 1, 2026, when the Law on Digital Technology Industry took effect, reclassifying crypto assets as “property” under the Civil Code. A stroke of legal genius, one might say, granting Hanoi the power to tax transactions, enforce inheritance rights, and investigate fraud-particularly the Quantum Financial System scams that left citizens with losses exceeding $1 million in late 2024. A most commendable effort to tidy up the financial garden, if one overlooks the thorns.

Regulatory Architecture: A Dance of Bureaucracy

The Ministry of Finance, with the grace of a hostess at a grand assembly, leads the licensing process in concert with the State Bank of Vietnam and the Ministry of Public Security. Their goal? To construct an onshore-only ecosystem, a veritable waltz of regulation designed to curb capital outflows and address money-laundering risks. One might admire the precision of their steps, though some observers wonder if the dance will be performed in the light of transparency or the shadows of control.

The Multi-Million Dollar Filter

The requirements, as lofty as a duchess’s expectations at a country ball, are designed to exclude all but the most affluent. Applicants must demonstrate paid-up capital of 10 trillion VND (~$390 million), with 35% sourced from established financial institutions. Foreign ownership is capped at 49%, ensuring that the infrastructure remains firmly in domestic hands. A most practical arrangement, one supposes, to prevent the foreign suitors from swaying the dance floor too much.

Once licensed, these exchanges shall be the sole venues for Vietnamese nationals to trade digital assets, per draft rules. Trading on global platforms such as Binance or OKX will be prohibited, with violators facing penalties as severe as a broken engagement ring. A most solemn promise of order, if one ignores the whispers of discontent from those who prefer the lively chaos of the international market.

Industry Divided Over Offshore Ban

The Vietnam Blockchain Association, with the enthusiasm of a society matron endorsing a new fashion, endorses the approach, arguing that regulated exchanges will keep transaction fees within the domestic economy. Critics, however, raise concerns about liquidity, comparing the situation to a debutante with no eligible suitors. International exchanges offer a dazzling array of trading pairs, while domestic startups may struggle to match the grandeur. Some even liken the restrictions to China’s Great Firewall, warning that such controls might merely drive trading underground, much like a scandalous affair that refuses to be buried.

For Hanoi, the trade-off appears deliberate, a calculated gamble to prioritize regulatory control over market depth. By channeling $200 billion through licensed intermediaries, the government bets that the allure of legitimacy will outweigh the charm of the status quo. A most intriguing wager, to be sure, though one wonders if the price of order will be worth the loss of spontaneity.

Read More

2026-03-17 16:38