Starknet has two important dates coming up. On June 9th, they’ll launch a new testnet. Then, on June 22nd, they plan to release version 0.14.3 to the main network, which includes an updated gas pricing system. This happens as the STRK token price is relatively low and activity on the network has slowed down.
We’ve updated how transaction fees work on our network. Now, the base fee will automatically adjust based on the current price of the STRK token. This means if the value of STRK changes, so will the cost to make transactions – and that’s intentional.
Will linking gas prices to a stable index help lower costs, encourage more people to use the network, and regain interest before the official launch date? These are the key questions right now.
With more competition among Ethereum‘s Layer-2 networks, Starknet is quickly updating its fee system. According to KuCoin News, testing will begin on June 9th, with a full launch planned for June 22nd. The change aims to make fees more predictable for users and applications by automatically adjusting them based on the price of STRK, as reported by ChainCatcher following an announcement from StarkWare/X.
Connecting the transaction fee to the token used to pay for those fees helps stabilize actual costs, but it can also create a situation where changes in the token’s value impact network prices, and vice versa.
Things aren’t looking amazing for Starknet right now, if I’m being honest. I checked DeFiLlama and the Total Value Locked (TVL) is around $179 million, and the network only generated about $5,600 in fees over the last 24 hours – that’s pretty low compared to other leading Layer 2 solutions. Looking at the STRK token itself, it hit an all-time low of around $0.03 on June 6th, and it’s currently trading around $0.034 with a market cap of about $217 million. This upgrade is happening at a really important time, considering these numbers.
What Starknet v0.14.3 Actually Changes
Dynamic base fee tied to STRK
The latest update, version 0.14.3, includes a new system for transaction fees on Starknet. This system automatically adjusts fees based on the price of the STRK token. The goal is to keep transaction costs stable in terms of real-world money (like US dollars or Ether), even if the token price fluctuates. If the STRK token’s value drops, the fee will increase slightly to prevent users from paying much higher prices for the same transaction. Details on exactly how this system is configured haven’t been fully released yet, but StarkWare is expected to share more information as the network launch gets closer.
Rollout timing and checkpoints
The team has set a tight deployment window:
- June 9: Testnet activation for v0.14.3, including the dynamic base gas fee feature (KuCoin News).
- Community feedback and monitoring on performance, edge cases, and wallet/provider readiness.
- June 22: Planned mainnet deployment of v0.14.3, pending testnet results (KuCoin News).
- Post‑upgrade observation for several weeks to evaluate fee stability, throughput, and developer adoption.
This is less about a one‑day switch and more about an iterative path to a steadier fee curve.
Why Price‑Indexed Gas Could Matter
For everyday users
When people are checking out, they mainly care about the total cost and how stable it is. If fees on a network are paid using a cryptocurrency whose value changes quickly, a fixed fee could end up costing different amounts in actual money over short periods. To solve this, linking the base transaction fee to the price of STRK aims to keep costs consistent, so what a transaction costs today will be similar to what it costs tomorrow.
This is especially helpful for smaller transactions like borrowing or lending small amounts, creating new digital items, and collecting earned rewards. People tend to avoid these activities when transaction costs are unpredictable. Just having the *feeling* that fees are stable can encourage more regular use.
For builders and sequencer economics
Developers and those predicting income for blockchain networks usually estimate costs and revenue using traditional currencies. Knowing how much money they’ll earn is crucial for planning budgets, how long they can operate, and setting rewards. If transaction fees adjust to maintain consistent pricing in traditional currencies, app creators can confidently set prices for their features or refunds. This also helps those managing the network predict their own income, though things like how often fees are updated and any limits on those fees will affect how reliable that income is.
Reducing sudden fee increases can also improve user experience, leading to better results like increased conversions and customer loyalty. When transaction costs are more predictable – avoiding unexpected doubling from one day to the next – people are less likely to stop using the service. However, whether this improvement is noticeable will depend on how closely base fees follow market prices and how clearly wallets display any changes.
How Starknet’s Approach Compares
Most popular Layer-2 networks (L2s) calculate transaction fees using Ether (ETH) and adjust them based on how busy the network is. Starknet is different because it directly links its base transaction fees to the current market price of its own token. Here’s a simple comparison of how different approaches work (this isn’t a complete list):
Here’s a breakdown of how different Layer-2 networks handle transaction fees (gas):
Starknet: Uses its STRK token to set fees based on current market prices. This aims to keep costs stable in terms of real-world money and connects the fee structure to the performance of the STRK token itself.
Arbitrum One, Optimism, Base, and zkSync Era: All use ETH for gas fees and adjust them based on how busy the network is. This provides a familiar experience for Ethereum users and avoids making fees dependent on the price of a new or separate token. Specifically:
* Arbitrum One: Fees change with network demand.
* Optimism: Uses simple, ETH-based fees that are easy to predict, especially for wallets used across multiple blockchains.
* Base: Aligns its ETH fees with the user experience found in the Coinbase ecosystem.
* zkSync Era: Keeps gas prices in ETH to avoid reliance on a native token.
There’s a clear benefit and drawback to each approach. Paying gas fees in ETH means the cost isn’t tied to any specific project’s token, but the actual price in dollars can change if the value of ETH fluctuates. Paying in a project’s token can offer more stable costs in real-world terms, but it’s important to have safeguards in place to prevent price swings from creating further instability.
The Current Read on Activity and Market Mood
Usage and fees
Recent data shows that Starknet’s activity is currently low. As of June 13, 2026, its total value locked (TVL) stands at approximately $179.45 million, and the network generated around $5,634 in fees over the past 24 hours (according to DeFiLlama). These lower fees suggest less activity compared to other layer-2 networks. While this could simplify making updates to the underlying technology, it also highlights the importance of increasing user demand.
Token backdrop
STRK recently hit its lowest price ever on June 6, 2026, at $0.02972, and is currently trading around $0.03412 with a market capitalization of approximately $216.84 million (according to CoinMarketCap data from June 13, 2026). This puts a lot of importance on the upcoming upgrade to deliver noticeable improvements for users. If successful, more predictable fees could encourage more frequent activity – like swaps, minting, and claims – leading to increased and sustained engagement. However, if the upgrade doesn’t deliver, the market might see it as just a superficial change.
Signals worth tracking immediately
Before the network officially launches, it’s important to check if wallets and the overall system are prepared. Specifically, do popular wallets accurately show transaction fees when the price of STRK changes quickly? And can applications easily adjust to these price fluctuations and estimate gas costs correctly? Any problems in these areas now could undermine the network’s intended stability.
What to Watch Between Now and June 22
Now that the test network is up and running, it provides a straightforward way to see if Starknet can regain interest and momentum.
- Testnet telemetry: Are base fees updating at the cadence and magnitude that produce smoother end‑user costs under varying STRK prices? Any outliers or oscillations?
- Wallet support: Do mainstream wallets quote consistent estimates and explain changes clearly? Fee transparency reduces abandonment.
- Dapp throughput: Are apps reporting fewer failed or delayed transactions during bursts of activity? Stability matters more than absolute cheapness for repeat tasks.
- Post‑mainnet metrics: After June 22, monitor daily fees, transaction counts, and TVL/concentrated liquidity on dashboards like DeFiLlama. Even single‑digit percentage upticks sustained over weeks are signal.
- Sequencer revenue steadiness: If base fees normalize dollar value, revenue variability should narrow; app teams and market makers may view that favorably.
- Developer chatter: Watch repos, issue trackers, and public engineering updates for edge cases discovered in testnet—and whether fixes land pre‑mainnet.
The June 22nd date is still an important target, but it doesn’t mean everything will change overnight. Getting support from a few trustworthy wallets and popular apps that work well with the new version (v0.14.3) would actually have a bigger impact on how people see things than any announcement.
Mechanics and Potential Edge Cases
How indexing can help—and hurt
Linking the base transaction fee to the price of STRK helps maintain a consistent cost for using L2 gas, regardless of price fluctuations. This prevents users from being surprised by large changes in fees when the token’s value goes up or down. However, this connection also means significant shifts in the token’s price could trigger fee adjustments that are either too high or too low, depending on how the system is set up.
Data sources and update cadence
The documentation didn’t detail where the price information comes from or how often it’s updated. These details are important because more frequent updates can reflect current prices accurately but might also fluctuate wildly. Less frequent updates provide a more stable price, but could fall behind during rapid market changes. The development team will need to find a good balance between quick responses to market shifts and predictable pricing, and they’ll likely adjust things based on how the system performs during testing.
UX and education
When transaction fees are tied to tokens, it’s crucial for wallets to be user-friendly. Unexpected and unexplained changes in fee estimates can quickly damage trust. If a wallet clearly explains that a fee change is due to token price fluctuations, users will be much less confused.
Adoption Pathways That Could Move the Needle
Short‑cycle actions
Simple actions like trading, creating new tokens, claiming rewards, and small payments are the quickest to benefit from more stable transaction fees. If these fees increase after an upgrade, the impact could grow quickly, particularly if apps remind users when fees return to normal.
Builder incentives
As an analyst, I’m seeing that more predictable transaction fees are making deployment decisions much simpler for development teams. We’re moving away from complex, custom fee arrangements towards clearer cost estimations and healthier unit economics. When you add in the consistent performance of the Starknet sequencer, it builds a really solid, practical argument – beyond just the hype – for building and launching projects there.
Liquidity routing
Companies that combine services and those who facilitate trades prioritize stable fees and reliable transactions. If fees become more predictable, trading activity could slowly return to established routes. While it might not make big news, keeping an eye on consistent trade volume is a good indicator of overall market health.
Risks & What Could Go Wrong
- Price‑feed fragility: If the STRK price input lags, fails, or is manipulated, base fees could misprice transactions at the worst time.
- Over‑correction: An aggressive update cadence may cause oscillating fees that frustrate users rather than helping them.
- Wallet fragmentation: Uneven wallet support or poor fee estimation UX can negate the benefit of the underlying mechanism.
- Adoption disappointment: If post‑mainnet metrics (fees, tx counts, TVL) don’t budge, the market may dismiss the change as cosmetic.
- Sequencer centralization risk: Pricing power concentrated in a small set of actors can raise governance and fairness concerns.
- Communication gap: Without clear docs and examples, developers might defer upgrades, delaying any positive network effects.
While engineering can build a reliable product, its success ultimately depends on user experience, affordability, and continued support from developers. A weakness in any of these areas can limit its overall effect.
Stay up-to-date on the latest in Layer 2 technologies and token markets with Crypto Daily. We provide a single source for tracking important updates like rollup improvements, how funds are moving, and security information. You can also follow what’s happening with Starknet and its competitors all in one place.
Frequently Asked Questions
What exactly is changing in Starknet v0.14.3?
This update includes a new system for Layer-2 transaction fees that automatically changes based on the price of STRK, as reported by ChainCatcher following StarkWare and X’s announcement. This change is designed to make fees more stable and predictable for both users and applications.
When will the upgrade hit testnet and mainnet?
According to KuCoin News, testing is expected to be completed by June 9, 2026, with a test version available then and the full launch planned for June 22, 2026 – assuming all tests are successful.
Will my transactions actually get cheaper?
In traditional currency, these tokens might seem more affordable when their value fluctuates. This system aims to keep costs stable, but it won’t necessarily make them permanently lower. How well this works will depend on the price of STRK and how often the base fees are adjusted.
Do I need STRK to pay gas, or can I still use ETH?
The system now uses the STRK token’s price to calculate the Layer 2 base fee. When making transactions on the main network, you’ll see clear instructions in your wallet about payment details. Please refer to official Starknet wallet documentation when the update is released for specific information on how fees will be collected.
How can I track whether the change is working?
Starting June 22nd, keep an eye on key metrics like daily fees, transaction numbers, and liquidity using tools like DeFiLlama. Also, check the price and market capitalization of STRK on CoinMarketCap to understand how the market reacts to changes after the upgrade.
What could delay or derail the rollout?
Problems found during testing, like software errors, issues with digital wallets, or slowdowns in performance, might delay the project’s launch. The team is currently using a test network to identify and resolve these problems before the planned release date of June 22nd.
How might this affect sequencer revenue and dapp economics?
Keeping base fees stable in terms of traditional currency could make sequencer income more predictable, allowing app developers to better plan for costs and rewards. How much of an impact this has will depend on how often the system is updated, any limits put in place, and how people actually use it after the changes.
Read More
- Silver Rate Forecast
- Gold Rate Forecast
- Brent Oil Forecast
- USD THB PREDICTION
- USD CNY PREDICTION
- USD RUB PREDICTION
- EUR CNY PREDICTION
- USD PHP PREDICTION
- EUR HKD PREDICTION
- CNY RUB PREDICTION
2026-06-13 16:45